Pricing Search Start free trial
For aviation war-risk underwriters

Your War & NCBR return, on live airspace data —
and every price defensible.

Paste your book — aircraft, airport, limit. The Console aggregates peak exposure per airport, attaches current airspace risk, and hands you a dated evidence pack plus a CSV for the Lloyd's return — no integration, no API to wire up.

Built around the AVN52 7-day reprice/cancel lever — the data that tells you when to pull it, and the audit trail to defend it afterward.

Console Solo $99/mo · Team $399/mo — no card, no sales call. Full grid on the pricing page.

Proof it's live · run any route free
Open full tool ↗
Try a live scenario
01 · Route
02 · Aircraft value TIV?
$150M Widebody
AP basis: ·

Directional estimate calibrated to publicly-reported March-2026 aviation war-risk figures (Lockton, Business Standard, trade press). Not a bound quote. FlySafe is a data provider, not a broker or insurer.

Indicative Additional Premium · draft record
Pick a route and hit Estimate premium.

A free directional estimate for one route — the same engine that scores your whole book at once in the return pack.

Public sources behind every score: EASA · FAA · ICAO · ADS-B (NIC/NACp) · UCDP · NASA FIRMS · open-source conflict & operator signals

If you underwrite aviation war-risk, you know this list.

  • ▸Pricing on week-old PDFs while war-risk premiums change in hours.
  • ▸Defending methodology to PRA / Lloyd's HHC with whatever your data vendor gave you last week.
  • ▸Reading AVN52 clauses your data vendors don't understand.
  • ▸Building Excel aggregations every Friday for the syndicate report.
  • ▸Watching loss data lag reality by quarters.
  • ▸Watching capacity withdraw in hours when an event drops.
Pakistan–India closure week, 2026

A broker calls Friday at 5pm — premium on the DEL–AMS hull, by Monday close. Your last data PDF is Tuesday's. The route now crosses three FIRs that weren't yellow when that PDF was written.

You quote on instinct, or you miss the line.

Whether the answer was right depends on data you couldn't have. That's the gap FlySafe closes.

NCBR Return Helper · in the Console

From your book to a filed return — three steps, no call.

The War & NCBR return is compulsory and annual — and the week it's due, someone rebuilds the exposure picture by hand. The Console builds it from your book in one sitting, dated and cited.

1

Paste your book.

Closes: rebuilding Excel aggregations by hand. Aircraft · airport · limit, straight from the binder or a spreadsheet into the NCBR Return Helper. Peak exposure aggregates per airport automatically.

2

Current airspace risk attaches itself.

Closes: pricing on week-old PDFs. Each airport carries the live risk level with regulator source-flags (EASA CZIB, FAA SFAR, NOTAMs) — the same continuously-refreshed engine behind the calculator above.

3

Export the dated pack.

Closes: defending the price with "the vendor said so." CSV for the filing, printable PDF record for the file — reference number, UTC timestamp, who ran it, and the cited sources behind every level.

Between returns

Pin the FIRs and routes on your book to a watchlist — the Console emails you when a risk level changes, so the AVN52 7-day reprice/cancel window stays actionable. Score history per FIR is retained daily for the trend view your bordereau commentary needs.

The record, block by block

Route-level view of the same engine that builds your return pack — scroll through the artifact.

FlySafe.zone
Airspace Risk Indices · Documented Record
Ref FS-RRA-20260718-ZRHDXB
Issued 2026-07-18 09:41 UTC
Engine v2 · 334-FIR
For [email protected]
Informational — not an operational clearanceSources: public regulatory & operational data

Route airspace-risk report

ZRH → DXB · Zurich → Dubai Intl · departure 2026-07-18
1Risk index

Route ZRH→DXB carries a risk index of 64 / 100 — HIGH band. A lower-risk reroute is available (see §2). Highest exposure at OIIX (78).

Highest FIROIIX · 78
Confidence82%
Coveragecovered · 9 FIRs
RerouteAvailable
Trend to departuretoday 58 ▲ 64
0 · Low255075100 · Critical
2Route corridor
#FIRNameCCScoreLevel
ZRHorigin · departure——
1LSAS Switzerland CH12 low
2LIRR Rome IT11 low
3LGGG Athens GR24 low
4HECC Cairo
Official NOTAM
EG41 moderate
5OEJD Jeddah
Official NOTAMTraffic anomaly
SA38 moderate
6OIIX Tehran
Regulator bulletinGPS jammingConflict activity
IR78 high
7OMAE Emirates
Official NOTAM
AE31 moderate
DXBdestination · arrival——

2,551 nm direct routing. A lower-risk reroute is available via LGGG → HECC → OEJD (+6% distance, max FIR risk 41) — avoids OIIX entirely.

3Evidence of record
  1. FACT
    Overflight restriction — several Western-registered carriers restricted in OIIX. since 2024-04 · source ↗
  2. FACT
    EASA advisory — Conflict Zone Information Bulletin, Tehran FIR · do not fly below FL320 CZIB-2026-04 · publ. 2026-05-12 · EASA ↗
  3. FACT
    Active NOTAMs — 14 active on route: OIIX (6) · OEJD (4) · HECC (3) · OMAE (1). Issuer text below; “notable” is our classifier, not the issuer’s grading.
    A0231/26 NOTAMN Q) OMAE/QRTCA/IV/BO/W/000/999/ A) OMAE B) 2607141200 C) 2607282359 E) RESTRICTED AREA ACTIVE. AIRSPACE CLSD BLW FL140 WI 25NM…
  4. OBSERVED
    FlySafe monitoring — 2 FIRs with a higher-than-usual share of low position-accuracy (NACp) reports. Our own inference from ADS-B / telemetry — no cause implied, not an external report.

Data as of 2026-07-18. NOTAMs current to 2026-07-18. “FlySafe monitoring” items are inferences from telemetry, not external sources.

4Sources & record
  • [a] Bilateral overflight registry — FlySafe curated
  • [b] EASA Conflict Zone Information Bulletins
  • [c] FAA & national NOTAM offices
  • [d] USGS earthquake feed · FlySafe ADS-B monitoring
Recorded decision

Proceeding (documented) — southern routing via HECC → OEJD avoids the elevated segment; PIC briefed, owner informed.

Recorded by J. Keller · Director of Operations · 2026-07-18 09:41 UTC
✓ Verifiable record
app.flysafe.zone/v/1042.9f3a1c7be2d4
Anyone holding this document can confirm its authenticity — no account needed.
Indicative airspace-risk output from publicly available data — informational only, not advice. The operator makes the operational decision. flysafe.zone/terms FS-RRA-20260718-ZRHDXB · Page 1 of 2 · © FlySafe.zone
01 · The number

A price basis you can defend — not “the vendor said so”

0–100 index with band, confidence and coverage, recomputed continuously — the route-level input behind a war-risk quote, current to the hour instead of Tuesday’s PDF.

02 · The exposure

Exposure per FIR, signal by signal

Every FIR the hull crosses, scored and tagged — the granularity your portfolio view and the AVN52 reprice decision actually need.

03 · The evidence

What Lloyd’s IMV calls documented judgment

Dated citations per elevated FIR — EASA bulletin references, raw NOTAM text — with our own telemetry marked separately as OBSERVED. Falsifiable inputs your validation team can pick apart, per IMV §2.10.1.

04 · The record

The quote file writes itself

Decision, written rationale, name, UTC timestamp — the dated basis-of-decision artifact that turns “we quoted on instinct” into a defensible file.

05 · The proof

Verifiable by the validation team — no account

Every saved record carries a public authenticity link. Hand the PDF to internal audit or PRA years later — the link still answers.

Start free 14-day trial →

Solo $99/mo · Team $399/mo · no card · first record in ~10 minutes

Why the record holds up in front of a validator.

"A change to a third-party provider view of risk cannot be automatically accepted as representing an update to the syndicate's view of risk."
— Lloyd's Internal Model Validation Guidance, January 2023

Translation: you need an audit trail that lets you validate FlySafe against your own profile — not a black-box index. Every score in the pack points back to the dated public sources that moved it, and the methodology paper maps to Lloyd's four validation template categories (Validation Review Signposting · Data Directory · Data Audit · Model Validation Evidence), so your validation team lifts the artifacts straight into theirs.

What's in a record
  • → Per-airport peak exposure + current risk level
  • → The dated, cited sources behind each level (EASA CZIB ref, NOTAM IDs, conflict-event signals)
  • → Reference number, UTC timestamp, who ran it
  • → CSV for the filing · printable PDF for the file
What we do NOT claim
  • × 100% accuracy. Scores are validated against a multi-signal event ground truth; every score carries its scoring_version and history is never rewritten — misses stay on the record.
  • × A black box. Expert judgments are documented and falsifiable per IMV §2.10.1 — you can pick them apart.
  • × Uniform depth everywhere. 334 FIRs are scored daily across four coverage tiers — every score ships with its confidence and coverage tier, so you can see exactly how solid the ground is under each number.

Sources cited: Lloyd's Internal Model Validation Guidance (January 2023) · Lloyd's Model Change Guidance (June 2025) · Marsh, Aviation War-Risk Coverage Presents Challenges (August 2023). Per-event analysis with cited sources: briefings archive.

How to start.

Console pricing — per seat

Solo $99/mo · Team $399/mo (up to 5 seats, shared journal)

The NCBR Return Helper and watchlist ship on Console plans — most desks pick Team. 14-day free trial, no card, no call.

Want scores flowing into your own PAS or pricing engine instead? The same engine runs as a REST API (single GET, ~50 ms, HMAC-signed webhooks) on request-based tiers with a free sandbox — see API plans. Optional, not the default.

Create your account

One click in your inbox opens the Console — generate the return pack in the 14-day free trial, no card, no sales call. Want the methodology paper or a sandbox API key instead? Say so here.

One click in your inbox activates your access — no card, no sales call.

No payment info required. Activation link arrives within a minute — the trial clock starts on your first Console visit, not today.

Specific questions we get from syndicates.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common search queries answered with current status, FIR codes, and source citations.

Do we have to integrate anything?
No — it is self-serve, no call. Paste your book (aircraft · airport · limit) into the Console and get a dated per-airport peak-exposure + airspace-risk pack for your War & NCBR return, plus a CSV for the filing. Between returns, pin FIRs or routes to a watchlist and the Console emails you when a risk level changes — no code required.
How is it priced?
Console Solo is $99/month (one seat), Team is $399/month (up to 5 seats, shared journal) — the NCBR Return Helper, watchlist alerts, and exportable records ship on both. Every account starts with a 14-day free trial: no card, no sales call. If you later want scores flowing into your own PAS or pricing engine, the same data runs as a REST API on request-based tiers (free sandbox to evaluate). Everything is on the pricing page.
How does this integrate with Subscribe / IRIS / our PAS?
The Console needs no integration — CSV/Excel out, PDF record per check. The API adds REST + HMAC-signed webhooks: if your PAS exposes a webhook endpoint, score-change alerts can post there directly. For anything custom, leave a note in the account form — a real person replies by email within one business day.
What happens to our model-adequacy story under Lloyd's IMV?
FlySafe outputs include per-FIR source lineage and stated falsifiability criteria per IMV §2.10.1. The methodology paper structure is built to map to Lloyd's four template categories — Validation Review Signposting, Data Directory & Data Policy Evidence, Data Audit Framework, Model Validation Evidence. Your validation team retains ownership of the syndicate's view of risk; we provide the artifacts.
What if FlySafe disagrees with our underwriter judgment?
Then you're doing your job. Per Lloyd's IMV: "A change to a third-party provider view of risk cannot be automatically accepted as representing an update to the syndicate's view of risk." FlySafe is one input — the final view of risk is yours.
How do you handle gateway-blocked sources (London QVA, Toulouse MetGate)?
Currently out of scope. We document the gap publicly in the methodology paper. For carriers whose risk depends on those advisories, we recommend supplementing with direct subscription and flag the limitation openly.
What's your current calibration error?
Accuracy is measured against a documented event ground truth, every scoring change ships with a validation run, and historical scores are never rewritten. The methodology paper spells out the full validation protocol against a multi-signal event ground truth. Rather than quote a headline calibration figure, we point at the record itself: versioned scores, never rewritten, hits and misses alike — the June 2026 Middle East closures are the worked example. Request the paper in the account form below.
How do you handle AVN52 nuclear / UNSC-5 termination triggers?
Both are automatic exclusions in market wording — no data vendor scores around them. Our role is to score the pre-trigger risk landscape so reprice/cancel decisions are informed before clauses activate. Per AJG's and Cambridge International & Comparative Law Quarterly analysis of AVN52E, that's where the underwriting value lives.

FlySafe provides automated computation of numerical indices from publicly available data. Indices and packs are inputs to your underwriting and validation processes — they do not constitute insurance advice, a certified risk rating, or a regulatory submission, and the final view of risk remains the syndicate's. See Terms of Service.